Friday, May 22, 2009

Child Support

My thoughts on the issue as a single mom...

Would it kill him to be on time for once? I get an on-time payment like, once a year. He's always at least one month behind. Very frustrating.

I tried to be nice. I think I was very generous during the process of establishing the amount (given the opportunity to have some input again, I won't be as kind...). He has a very easy task--pay the required amount by a certain day every month. It is not a lot. It is less than a car payment. Less than an electric bill for a single family home in the summer months.

If adults actually did what they were supposed to do 99% of the time, the world would be a lot better place. In my not so humble opinion, child support is only required when parents DON'T do what they're supposed to do. Responsible adults should be able to come together and formulate a plan to raise their children without the intervention of the courts. When one party is lacking rationality, fairness, responsibility, trustworthiness, or any combination thereof, that's when the drama starts.

I have a lot of male friends. All of them have very bitter feelings towards the child support process. I can understand, somewhat. Most men tend to feel that they get the shaft in that process. I do think a lot of good fathers are treated unjustly in court as a reaction to the bad behavior of so many fathers. And that's not right. But in lieu of an agreement with the mother, what other recourse is there but court? It's a flawed process, but there has to be SOME process. I can understand wanting to reform it, but wanting to abolish it all together? Not possible. I have some otherwise rational and very intelligent male friends who are just adamantly opposed to the child support process...That I just DON'T understand. You have a kid, kids cost a lot of money, and if you're the non-custodial parent you have to pay the other parent. Period, the end. How else does the child get properly taken care of when there is no agreement? Or if an existing agreement isn't being followed?

Incidentally, I think the same goes for when a woman is the NCP. Which admittedly, doesn't happen very much. I think both parents should be given an equal opportunity to be the primary caregiver. I don't make any differences based on gender. I agree with fatherhood advocates that mothers shouldn't automatically be given an advantage in court, unless the child is very young (under 2). But once custody is established, whoever doesn't get the kid has to eat it. Unless something is worked out. That's the reality of a "broken family" scenario. It's not ever going to be perfectly fair and wonderful for both parties. Someone always has the advantage, whether it be a big one or a small one.

So...try to work it out before going to court. That's my philosophy. Be reasonable. Be fair. Of course, if how you conducted yourself prior to the support issue created enmity or demonstrated that you can't be trusted to live up to your agreements, you're screwed. The other parent would be a fool to NOT access the enforcement powers of the state. I am a very reasonable and fair person. For me, court is always the option of last resort, in any situation. But once it's done, it's done. You are then legally obligated to adhere to terms of the order, and just because you didn't take your ex-wife, girlfriend, lover, friend, whatever seriously or don't like the agreement, doesn't change the fact that there's a court order to which both parties must adhere. It's not something that can just be erased because all of a sudden you want to be more reasonable. The time for being reasonable is BEFORE the court process begins, not after.

Being bitter about it doesn't relieve you of your responsibilities towards your children. That goes for mothers and fathers. Mothers who withhold visitation to punish for child support issues are jerks and should be threatened with incarceration just as much as a father who is delinquent on support payments. There is just no excuse for either.

It's all very unfortunate. But a reality for single parents everywhere.

5 comments:

  1. I know your frustrations very well. My sisters have been down this road for over 20 years. I hope it all works out well.

    On a lighter note look at what Oprah did for Patti Labelle:

    Patti LaBelle at 7:41pm May 24
    Well....... Oprah bought me a house in Montecito Southern California which is 30 Acres and my son done a painting of me holding him at birth. His gift is the best. He did it himself. He also bought the two of us tickets to Jamaica for a vaction..... I cant ask for more... Thank you all for the wonderful messages and gifts. I have 800 gifts so far and still counting....

    I not trying to hate but damn!!!!! Oprah got money no doubt! Patti I know got money...not Oprah money but she has to be well off. Makes me want to send a letter in to Oprah...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've been a follower of yours for a lil bit and for the most part I feel what you write is nice. This one kinda confused me though. I feel you are smarter than this. Let me explain.

    Why on Earth do you expect a person to pay something on time that they don't want to pay? I mean think about it. Have you paid every single one of your bills on time all the time?

    This particular bill is the worse to pay. A person is basically paying for a mistake they made years ago. I mean yes you are blessed with a child, but how does the person paying feel? I think the person feels like crap and realizes he is paying for the rest of his life cause of not wearing a condom.

    This is what gets me though.

    1. Women barely use that money for there child. It used for partying with friends, buying a bigger house, or luxury items. I have rarely seen a mother actually use that money for the child completely. I see all these women complaining about where is my child support money. Let's take a look at history. My mom raised me and my sisters with no child support money. Keep in mind she is black and it was much harder back then. So i truly don't get it. Maybe the real truth is women are living outside of there means and need extra money to make things work. I mean how is it you have one child and you need this extra income and my mom had 5 kids and had 2 jobs and didn't want any money my father tried to give.
    2. I told my girlfriend the same thing and she agrees. That money he sends you should just go into a savings account until your child turns 18. Then let him have that money. I mean do you really need this money, or is more of a want. You don't need cable, internet, tv. Those are luxury items. If you add up most of that it's probably equal to what he is paying you. You don't need unlimited text messages as well. Save a lil here and put some aside for there. You will learn you don't need that money. If and when it comes in it will be a blessing. To many women rely on that man to give him child support money. I mean, if he wasn't around for the child being born what makes you think he is gonna go into his wallet and pay for the child?
    3. I feel some women use the child support money as revenge. More than likely the case is that the man you were with hurt you on an emotional level and each month you can make him pay with money. He isn't there for you, nor your child. He is probably married to some bimbo with other children and this how a person gets revenge. Child support. If i can't have you, i will make you pay.

    final thoughts. Child support should be done by a third party. He gives the money to this company, and the company gives the child whatever the child needs. New shoes? they buy the shoes. Food? the purchase the food. That way the man will more than likely pay on time everytime because he knows the money is truly being used to help the child not help mommy get her drink on with her friends while someone is babysitting the child.

    Keep writing! love the haikus

    mutedmagician aka mike

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Mike,

    Welcome! You commented anonymously but now you're not so anonymous. :)

    General comment: You are right, I usually pay the bills last that I want to pay the least. I hate shelling out that money. But when I have the money, I do pay them perfectly on time. Why? Because the consequences of not doing so are worse than the money I'm shelling out. Late fees, interest, bad credit, stuff getting shut off, etc. etc. etc. Those are my bills, they are my responsibility, and if I don't take care of them promply, things starting getting ugly fast. A very good analogy to the child support, don't you think?

    1. Let's agree to disagree here. Do I think some child support awards are for far more than the mother needs? Absolutely. And it's usually because the formula is designed to allow a child to live a certain "lifestyle" based on the income of mom and dad. If mom and dad are doing quite well for themselves, the amount gets set pretty high. Mom has an amount she's expected to contribute to that lifestyle as well. And that includes cable, internet, etc. As far as the formula, in my case, I asked for LESS than the formula would have allowed me--because I didn't want anything more from him than what I needed. What I asked for was beyond fair. To the point of stupidity, most other mothers would agree. And I can't even get that on time.

    2.I am still able to afford life's "luxuries" without his money. Like you said, I don't rely on it. When it comes, it comes. But...in the end, it's on him what happens when he doesn't pay. Just because I'm not pressed over it doesn't mean he doesn't have an obligation to pay and pay on time. The state enforces that, not me. He's been to court 3x in the last 3 years. Living dangerously...

    3. I agree that this happens. Not true in my case, but it happens. I think fathers who contribute to their child's life day in and day out, who have partial custody, drop off and pick up at school, have entire weekends and weeks during the summer, and can be counted on to provide for the child as far as food, clothes, child care, etc. on a regular basis should NOT have to pay support. Those are the ideal situation that I was talking about. Mom and Dad have a mutual understanding that they can both be counted on to agree on. Not the case in my situation. I'm not dealing with an ideal situation. The court is my only remedy. It's not about revenge, it's about an expectation that an adult is supposed to contribute to their offspring's survival in a myriad of ways, and if none of the above is happening, then off to court we go...

    I'm not opposed to a third party solution. If I could be guaranteed to receive the money on time every month, I would have no problem accounting for how it is spent. I see that as fair. The system is not designed that way at the moment, but it would be fair. If the money isn't being sent on time, eff you though. It's none of your business how I spend it. You don't know what sacrifices had to be made to pick up your slack. So now that it's here, how I spend it is my business. I think that's fair too. KWIM?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's mike again. I didn't mean to be annoymous. I just haven't figured out this damn blog thing yet. Keeps signing me out and when i sign back on it pops me on to someone elses blog. Long story short, didn't feel like figuring it out cause I was running late to a bbq in MD. Which by the way, so sick of all my friends living in MD. It's like i'm the only one in VA. Rabbit trail. Sorry, but thanks for the response though. ps. What does KWIM stand for?

    ReplyDelete